Combination of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600E-Mutated Thyroid Cancer.

Purpose: BRAF mutations are detected in 30-80% of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) cases. Dabrafenib and trametinib showed promising antitumor activity in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated metastatic melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with metastatic BRAFV600E-mutated thyroid cancer. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with metastatic BRAFV600E-mutated PTC. The patients received dabrafenib 150 mg twice daily and trametinib 2 mg once daily at the Samsung Medical Center. This study evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) overall survival (OS), and safety of dabrafenib and trametinib. Results: Between December 2019 and January 2022, 27 PTC patients including 8 patients with poorly differentiated or anaplastic transformation, received dabrafenib and trametinib. The median age was 73.0 years, and the median follow-up period was 19.8 months. The majority (81.5%) had undergone thyroidectomy, while 8 patients had received prior systemic treatments. ORR was 73.1%, with 19 partial responses, and DCR was 92.3%. Median PFS was 21.7 months, and median OS was 21.7 months. Treatment-related adverse events included generalized weakness (29.6%), fever (25.9%), and gastrointestinal problems (22.2%). Dose reduction due to adverse events was required in 81.5% of the patients. Conclusion: Dabrafenib and trametinib demonstrated a high ORR with promising PFS; however, most patients with BRAFV600E-mutated metastatic PTC required a dose reduction.

First-Line Alectinib vs. Brigatinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with ALK Rearrangement: Real-World Data.

PURPOSE: Alectinib and brigatinib are second-generation anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinases (ALKs) that are widely used as first-line therapy for treating ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the lack of a head-to-head comparison of these drugs as first-line therapies, this retrospective observational study aimed to compare the real-world efficacy and safety of alectinib and brigatinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received alectinib or brigatinib as the first-line treatment for ALK-positive advanced NSCLC were evaluated for clinical outcomes of objective response rate (ORR), intracranial ORR, time to next treatment (TTNT), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles. RESULTS: Of 208 patients who received either alectinib or brigatinib as a first-line treatment, 176 received alectinib and 32 received brigatinib. At the data cutoff point, the median follow-up duration was 16.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7 to 18.3) in the brigatinib group and 27.5 months (95% CI, 24.6 to 30.4) in the alectinib group. The ORR was 92.5% with alectinib and 93.8% for brigatinib. The intracranial ORR rates were 92.7% (38/41) and 100% (10/10), respectively. The rate of PFS at 12 months was comparable between the alectinib group and the brigatinib groups (84.4% vs. 84.1%, p=0.64), and the median TTNT, PFS, and OS were not reached in either group. Treatment-related adverse events were usually mild, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was rare (alectinib 4.5% vs. brigatinib 6.25%). CONCLUSION: Alectinib and brigatinib had similar clinical benefits when used as the first-line treatment of NSCLC patients with ALK rearrangement in the real world.

Tumor mutation burden in gastro-entero-pancreatic-neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Background: As rare tumors, there are limited treatment options for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Recently, microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutation burden (TMB) have been emerging as potential biomarkers in various tumors. However, there is a lack of research on the use of these biomarkers in gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP)-NENs. Methods: We analyzed 31 patients diagnosed with GEP-NEN between 2013 to 2022. The TMB and MSI analyses using next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed for all patients. The TruSightTM Oncology 500 assay from Illumina was used as the NGS panel. Results: Out of the 31 patients analyzed, the most frequent primary origin was the pancreas (12 patients, 38.7%), followed by the stomach (4 patients, 12.9%), gallbladder (4 patients, 12.9%), rectum (7 patients, 22.6%), small bowel (2 patients, 6.5%), and bile duct (1 patient, 3.2%). Among these patients, 19 (61.3%) were diagnosed with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, with grade 2 being the most common (15 patients, 48.4%), followed by grade 3 (3 patients, 9.7%) and grade 1 (1 patient, 3.2%). Neuroendocrine carcinoma was confirmed in 12 patients (38.7%). The median number of metastases was 2.0 [interquartile range (IQR), 1.0-3.0], and the liver was the most common site of metastasis (23 patients, 74.2%). The median TMB was 4.7 (IQR, 3.1-6.3) mutations/Mb, and all tumors were classified as microsatellite stability (MSS). Only one patient had a high TMB (266.4 mutations/Mb), which was a grade 3 neuroendocrine tumor originating from the pancreas. The TMB value did not vary depending on the primary tumor site or World Health Organization (WHO) grade. Conclusions: This analysis showed that, despite very low incidence, there are GEP-NENs with high TMB. For precision medicine, testing for MSI and TMB is needed for this tumor type.

The Optimal Tumor Mutational Burden Cutoff Value as a Novel Marker for Predicting the Efficacy of Programmed Cell Death-1 Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE: The optimal tumor mutational burden (TMB) value for predicting treatment response to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the optimal TMB cutoff value that could predict the efficacy of PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors in AGC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with AGC who received pembrolizumab or nivolumab between October 1, 2020, and July 27, 2021, at Samsung Medical Center in Korea were retrospectively analyzed. The TMB levels were measured using a next-generation sequencing assay. Based on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the TMB cutoff value was determined. RESULTS: A total 53 patients were analyzed. The TMB cutoff value for predicting the overall response rate (ORR) to PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors was defined as 13.31 mutations per megabase (mt/Mb) with 56% sensitivity and 95% specificity. Based on this definition, 7 (13.2%) patients were TMB-high (TMB-H). The ORR differed between the TMB-low (TMB-L) and TMB-H (8.7% vs. 71.4%, P=0.001). The progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) for 53 patients were 1.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.600-2.268) and 4.26 months (95% CI, 2.992-5.532). The median OS was longer in the TMB-H (20.8 months; 95% CI, 2.292-39.281) than in the TMB-L (3.31 months; 95% CI, 1.604-5.019; P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The TMB cutoff value for predicting treatment response in AGC patients who received PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy as salvage treatment was 13.31 mt/Mb. When applying the programmed death ligand-1 status to TMB-H, patients who would benefit from PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors can be selected.

Comparison of prophylactic effects for chemotherapy induced neutropenia between same-day versus next-day administration of pegteograstim (Neurapeg®) in patients treated with chemotherapy regimen composed of day 1 intensive myleosuppressive agent: A randomized phase III clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Administration of pegylated granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (peg-GCSF) 24 to 72 hours after chemotherapy is usually recommended. Next-day administration (after 24 hours) resulted in fewer duration of grade (Gr) 4 chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) and decreased severity of CIN than same-day (within 4 hours). However, patients sometimes receive same-day Peg-GCSF for the sake of convenience. In addition, a few prior studies showed that the same-day method is comparable or superior to the next-day method in preventing CIN, especially in chemotherapy regimens that include day 1 myelosuppressive agents. Thus, we aim to verify the hypothesis that same-day administration of pegteograstim, a new formulation of peg-GCSF, is non-inferior to next-day administration in terms of Gr4 CIN duration. METHODS: This study is a randomized, multicenter, open-label, investigator-initiated phase 3 study. Patients with adjuvant/neoadjuvant or first-line palliative chemotherapy comprising intensively myelosuppressive agents on day 1 (mFOLFIRINOX, ECb, EP, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOX) are enrolled. The patients are assigned to the same-day arm or the next-day arm in a 1:1 ratio. The randomizations are stratified according to number of patient CIN risk factors (1 vs ≥2), chemotherapy setting (perioperative vs palliative), and interval (2-week vs 3-week). In the same-day arm, pegteograstim 6 mg is subcutaneously injected within 4 hours after completion of chemotherapy. In the next-day arm, pegetograstim is injected at 24 to 36 hours post-chemotherapy. A complete blood count test is performed daily from day 5 to 9 during the cycle 1. The primary endpoint is duration of Gr4 CIN (cycle 1), and secondary endpoints include incidence of Gr 3 to 4 CIN (cycle 1), severity of CIN (cycle 1), time to recovery absolute neutrophil count 1000/µL (cycle 1), incidence of febrile neutropenia, incidence of CIN-related dose delay, and dose intensity. In order to verify non-inferiority of 0.6 days, we estimated a significance level of 5%, power of 80%, and drop-out rate of 15%. This results in the need for a total of 160 patients, 80 in each group.

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in biliary tract cancer with KRAS mutation.

Background: With a 15% incidence, KRAS is one of the most common mutations in biliary tract cancer (BTC) and is a poor prognostic factor. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as salvage therapy have modest activity in BTC. Objectives: There are limited data on the efficacy of ICIs according to KRAS mutation in BTC. We evaluated the efficacy of ICIs in BTC patients with or without KRAS mutations. Design: Retrospective observational study. Methods: We conducted molecular profiling in BTC patients who received ICIs as salvage therapy. The expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) on tumor cells was assessed using immunohistochemistry. The TruSightTM Oncology 500 assay from Illumina was used as a cancer panel. We analyzed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of ICI in BTC patients according to KRAS mutation and PD-L1 expression. Results: A total of 62 patients were included in this analysis. The median age was 68.0 years; 47 patients (75.8%) received pembrolizumab and 15 (24.2%) received nivolumab as salvage therapy. All patients received gemcitabine plus cisplatin as the frontline therapy, and 53.2% received fluoropyrimidine plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) before ICI. The median number of lines of prior chemotherapy was 2.5. The KRAS mutation was found in 13 patients (19.1%), and 28 patients (45.2%) showed 1% or more of tumor cells out of visible tumor cells positive for PD-L1. There was no statistical correlation between KRAS mutation and PD-L1 expression. The median OS and PFS with ICI were 5.6 [interquartile range (IQR): 3.3-8.0] and 3.8 (IQR: 3.0-4.5) months, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in PFS with ICIs according to KRAS mutation (mutant type versus wild type) and PD-L1 expression (positive versus negative). In subgroup analysis, patients with both KRAS mutation and PD-L1 positivity had longer PFS compared with patients with KRAS mutation and PD-L1 negativity (10.1 versus 2.6 months, p = 0.047). This finding was not shown in patients with wild-type KRAS. Conclusion: Our analysis suggested that PD-L1 expression might be a useful biomarker for ICIs in BTC patients with KRAS mutation but not in those with wild-type KRAS.

Retrospective analysis of diagnosis and therapeutic strategies for patients with hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma.

Hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma (HSTCL) is a rare and aggressive lymphoma with no standard treatment and poor treatment response. From 2001-2021, 20 from a lymphoma cohort of 7247 patients (0.27%) were diagnosed with HSTCL at Samsung Medical Center. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 37.5 (range, 17-72) years, and 75.0% of patients were male. Most patients had B symptoms, hepatomegaly, and splenomegaly. Lymphadenopathy was found in only 31.6% of patients, and increased PET-CT uptake was found in 21.1% of patients. Thirteen patients (68.4%) expressed T cell receptor (TCR) γδ, and 6 patients (31.6%) expressed TCRαß. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 7.2 months (95% CI, 2.9-12.8), and the median overall survival (OS) was 25.7 months (95% CI, not calculated). In subgroup analysis, the overall response rate (ORR) was 100.0% in the ICE/Dexa group and 53.8% in the anthracycline-based group, and the complete response rate was 83.3% in the ICE/Dexa group and 38.5% in the anthracycline-based group. The ORR was 50.0% in the TCRαß group and 83.3% in the TCRγδ group. The OS was not reached in the autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) group and was 16.0 months (95% CI, 15.1-16.9) in the non-transplant group at the data cutoff time (P value 0.015). In conclusion, HSTCL is rare but has a very poor prognosis. The optimal treatment strategy is not defined. More genetic and biological information is needed.

Expanded Access Program Pralsetinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Rearranged during Transfection (RET) Gene Rearrangement.

PURPOSE: Rearranged during transfection (RET) gene rearrangement is a well-known driver event in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pralsetinib is a selective inhibitor of RET kinase and has shown efficacy in oncogenic RET-altered tumors. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of expanded access program (EAP) use of pralsetinib in pretreated, advanced NSCLC patients with RET rearrangement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received pralsetinib as part of the EAP at Samsung Medical Center were evaluated through a retrospective chart review. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) ver. 1.1 guidelines. Secondary endpoints were duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles. RESULTS: Between April 2020 and September 2021, 23 of 27 patients were enrolled in the EAP study. Two patients who were not analyzed due to brain metastasis and two patients whose expected survival was within 1 month were excluded from the analysis. After a median follow-up period of 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.0 to 21.2), ORR was 56.5%, the median PFS was 12.1 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 20.9), and the 12-month OS rate was 69.6%. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were edema (43.5%) and pneumonitis (39.1%). A total of 8.7% of patients experienced extra-pulmonary tuberculosis. TRAEs with a common grade of three or worse were neutropenia (43.5%) and anemia (34.8%). Dose reduction was required in nine patients (39.1%). CONCLUSION: Pralsetinib presents a clinical benefit when used in patients with RET-rearranged NSCLC, consistent with a pivotal study.

The role of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy after failure of nivolumab plus doublet chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Background: Adding nivolumab to fluoropyrimidines and platinum agents has been considered a new standard first-line treatment in previously untreated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, there were few data on the role of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line treatment after failure of nivolumab plus doublet chemotherapy. Herein, we analyzed the efficacy and safety of second-line ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in AGC patients refractory to nivolumab plus chemotherapy. Methods: This analysis included AGC patients with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy after failing to respond to nivolumab plus doublet chemotherapy [capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) or 5-fluorouracil plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)] at Samsung Medical Center, Korea. Twenty patients who progressed on nivolumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy were treated with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel between December 2021 and September 2022. Results: The median age was 56 (range, 24-76) years, and 13 (65.0%) were men. Of the 20 patients, 15 (75.0%) patients received nivolumab plus capecitabine, and oxaliplatin, while 5 (25.0%) patients received nivolumab plus 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin. Two showed a partial response (PR) to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel, a response rate of 10%. Patients with stable disease (SD) accounted for a disease control rate (DCR) of 55.0%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel was 2.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7-3.7]. Subgroup analysis showed that responders (n=7) to first-line therapy had a PFS of 6.9 months compared to 2.3 months in non-responders (n=13) to first-line therapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months (95% CI: 5.5-8.3), representing 6.9 months (95% CI: not calculated) in responders and 6.3 months (95% CI: 3.7-8.9) in non-responders (P=0.401). Conclusions: This analysis suggested that ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as second-line therapy might be further studied in AGC patients after failure of nivolumab plus chemotherapy. A new second-line therapy is needed in AGC patients after nivolumab plus chemotherapy.

Effect of ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in advanced gastric cancer according to the status of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.

Background: Ramucirumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb), inhibits angiogenesis and reduces tumor activity. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) might act upon VEGFR2 to induce cancer cell angiogenesis and metastasis. Herein, we investigated the efficacy of combining ramucirumab and paclitaxel according to the status of PD-L1 expression in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: This analysis included AGC patients who received ramucirumab plus paclitaxel as 2nd line therapy between December 1, 2018, and February 28, 2022, at Samsung Medical Center. All patient data analyses included an evaluation of PD-L1 expression using the combined positive score (CPS). We analyzed the efficacy and the survival of patients according to their PD-L1 expression. Results: We included 117 patients in this analysis, and 80 patients (68.4%) had a PD-L1 CPS of one or more, 37 (31.6%) had five or more, and 19 (16.2%) had ten or more scores. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ significantly between patients with a PD-L1 CPS of less than one and one or more {PD-L1 <1% vs. PD-L1 ≥1%; PFS: median 3.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.4-4.8 months] vs. median 4.1 months (95% CI: 3.5-4.7 months), P=0.93; PD-L1 <1% vs. PD-L1 ≥1%; OS: median 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.4-8.6 months) vs. median 8.1 months (95% CI: 6.4-9.8 months), P=0.32}. PFS and OS did not differ significantly between patients with a PD-L1 CPS of less than 5 and 5 or more [PD-L1 <5% vs. PD-L1 ≥5%; PFS: 3.9 months (95% CI: 3.3-4.5 months) vs. 4.4 months (95% CI: 3.0-5.8 months), P=0.57; OS: 7.4 months (95% CI: 6.5-8.3 months) vs. 10.0 months (95% CI: 1.1-18.9 months), P=0.07]. Interestingly, with a PD-L1 CPS cutoff of 10, PFS and OS did differ significantly [PD-L1 <10% vs. PD-L1 ≥10%; PFS: 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.3-4.3 months) vs. 5.7 months (95% CI: 4.1-7.3 months), P=0.05; OS: 7.2 months (95% CI: 6.5-7.9 months) vs. 18.9 months (95% CI: 6.5-31.3 months), P=0.04]. Conclusions: No biomarkers have been established to predict survival times after ramucirumab plus paclitaxel treatment. This analysis suggests that a PD-L1 CPS cutoff of 10 might be novel a biomarker to predict the survival of AGC patients treated with ramucirumab and paclitaxel.